In the opening
to The Decameron (c. 1350), Boccaccio described how the ten young people
who would become storytellers in his book met in a Florentine church during the
height of the Black Death: “it chanced
[…] that there foregathered in the venerable church of Santa Maria Novella,
one Tuesday morning when there was well-nigh none else there, seven young
ladies […] who had heard divine service in mourning attire… […] there entered
the church three young men […] and they went seeking […] to see their
mistresses, who, as it chanced, were all three among the seven aforesaid”
Boccaccio’s
description of young people meeting their friends to plan an escape from the
plague-ridden city reminds us of a significant aspect of churches in the early
modern period: their use for non-liturgical activities. As a venue for covert
assignations, legal meeting, and even social events, the church interior
witnessed more than mere religious rite.
Condemnations
by conservative ecclesiastics provide compelling evidence that secular
activities regularly occurred in the Renaissance church. Archbishop Antoninus
of Florence cautioned that secular meetings, trials, and theatrical
performances should not take place in church, except for religious plays. San
Bernardino da Siena castigated the use of churches as locations for dances,
business meetings, and courtship rituals between young girls and potential
suitors. This latter activity particularly offended Savonarola, who complained
that Florentine mothers “put [their daughters] on show and doll them up so they
look like nymphs, and first thing they take them to the Cathedral”. In
Orsanmichele, a civic oratory in Florence (Figure 1), guards were instructed to
“take care that in this church men do not have conversations with women”; and a
notice on the doors ordered worshippers – especially women – to leave
immediately after services without rendezvousing with others to converse. In
1588, a wooden screen was installed in the building specifically designed “to
obviate the problems of secret meetings and illicit conversations”, evidently
euphemistic terms for sexual activities.
Non-liturgical
activities in church, however, were not always so irreligious. With its aura of
dignity and ample room for large gatherings, the church could also host secular
activities of a more serious nature. For example, the local neighborhood
(‘gonfalone’) of the Red Lion in Florence would hold regular meetings in the
monks’ church of San Pancrazio, where they also donated choir stalls emblazoned
with their insignia (Figure 2). Choir
precincts for secular notarial acts sometimes involving lay women, revealing
how liturgical space could function differently according to time and context. Church
buildings are also documented as venues for musical concerts, war councils and
university graduations.
Perhaps reacting
to this diverse usage of church buildings for secular and social functions, the
Council of Trent – a Catholic church council which met from 1545-63 in response
to the Protestant Reformation – sought to create a more prayerful and religious
atmosphere in church. In addition to banning lascivious images and music, the
Council decreed that “[t]hey shall also banish from churches […] all secular
actions; vain and therefore profane conversations, all walking about, noise,
and clamor, that so the house of God may be seen to be, and may be called,
truly a house of prayer.” In
addition, Pope Pius V published a papal bull imposing monetary penalties on
those who committed irreverent acts in church which disturbed divine office,
including having vulgar conversations (especially with women), committing
attacks, making noises, disrespectfully sitting or walking around, and turning
one’s back to the holy Sacrament.
This shift – from the multifunctional church interior to one more focused on religious devotion – is an emergent theme in my book, Transforming the Church Interior in Renaissance Florence(Cambridge University Press, 2022). More broadly, the book concerns the removal in the later sixteenth century of the monumental screens and choir precincts which had previously divided the church interior into distinct spatial zones; however, an unforeseen consequence of these divisions was that they made the interior as a whole harder to surveil. When screens were eliminated, the church became more open and spacious, and religious devotion was focused on a Eucharistic tabernacle displayed on the high altar (Figure 3): a symbol of Catholic Counter Reformation dogma.
Figure 1. Orsanmichele, Florence. Photo: author Figure 2. Choir Stalls, Vallombrosa Abbey. Transferred from San Pancrazio, Florence, in 1574-77. Figure 3. Eucharistic Tabernacle, Milan Cathedral. Photo: Zairon
Transforming the Church Interior in Renaissance Florence By Joanne Allen
Joanne Allen studied at the Courtauld Institute of Art and the University of Warwick, and completed postdoctoral fellowships in Rome, Florence, and Venice. She teaches at American University, where she won a teaching award, and her research has been supported by the Renaissance Society of America and the Italian Art Society. She is a choral singer ...
Latest Comments
Have your say!