In the last few years, it has become apparent that there are two theories of cosmology that can claim to successfully explain the observations. The standard theory is called the LCDM (Lambda-cold dark matter) model; the competing theory is called MOND, for modified Newtonian dynamics. Unlike the standard model, MOND does not postulate the existence of dark matter — the mysterious substance that comprises (according to standard-model theorists) the bulk of the mass of the universe. Observations that are explained under the standard model by invoking dark matter, are explained under MOND by postulating a modification to Einstein’s theory of gravity.
According to the standard model, the
dark particles are passing through every terrestrial laboratory. But every
attempt to detect them has failed. Standard-model theorists explain this fact
by suggesting that the dark particles are so weakly interacting with normal
matter that we can not hope to observe them, even if they are present.
Of course, both of these
cosmological theories could be wrong. But at most one of them can be right. How
can we determine which one?
Philosophers of science suggest an
answer: by comparing methodologies. There is something approaching a consensus
among philosophers that there is a “good” way and a “bad” way for theories to
evolve. The “bad” way is via post-hoc accommodation: the theory is adjusted, or
reinterpreted, to bring its predictions in line with each new piece of data as
it becomes available. The “good” way is via prior prediction: the theory
predicts facts in advance of their discovery, without (and this is crucial) any
adjustments to the theory.
In this respect, the two theories
are strikingly different. MOND has repeatedly made successful, new predictions,
while the standard model has rarely, if ever, achieved this, at least not since
the addition of dark matter to the theory around 1980.
My book is a systematic exploration
of how the alternate theory has evolved, paying close attention to whether its
evolution has satisfied the criteria set forth by the philosophers.
Latest Comments
Have your say!