Fifteen Eighty Four

Academic perspectives from Cambridge University Press


Emotions, A Virtual Roundtable: Week Three

Ross Buck, Ursula Hess, Rolf Reber, Martijn van Zomeren

Photo courtesy of David Castillo Dominici/www.freedigitalphotos.net/

In the third week of our virtual roundtable on emotions, we ask:

Do our emotions affect our health?


Rolf Reber, author of Critical Feeling: How to Use Feelings Strategically

Ross Buck, author of Emotion: A Biosocial Synthesis

Ursula Hess and Agneta Fischer, authors of Emotional Mimicry in Social Context:

Martijn Van Zomeren, author of From Self to Social Relationships: An Essentially Relational Perspective on Social 


Rolf Reber:

Yes, a lot of research points to how emotions affect stress and how stress affects health. Instead of reviewing these findings, I would like to direct the attention to another question: Should we aim at positive emotions with the aim in mind to improve our health? My answer is an unqualified no. This does not mean that we neglect either positive emotions or our health. However, we should not seek positive emotions only for the sake of health. It may well be that we do not reap the full benefits of positive emotions when we monitor whether we are really happy or whether we are really healthy. This is similar to pursue happiness or to pursue virtue. These are states that are by-products of actions done for their own sake. Monitoring happiness or virtue may undermine the very state that we seek to attain, as I describe in more detail in my book on critical feeling.


Ross Buck:

Yes, and the mechanisms of such influence are increasingly understood. Emotions affect immune system responding in several ways. Chronic emotional stress hyper-activates the sympathetic nervous system and stimulates the immune system needlessly, leading to eventual immune system exhaustion as demonstrated in the classic stress syndrome; two of the cardinal symptoms of which are shrinking of the thymus (origin of T-cells) and lymph nodes. Chronic stress also is associated with hyper-activation of the pituitary-adrenal axis, initiating many problematic responses including increasing clotting factor in the blood. There is also persuasive evidence that life events can predispose to disease (perhaps moderated by stress), and that problems in emotional expression and communication can contribute to cardiovascular disease (Type-A personality), cancer (Type-C personality), and psychosomatic disorder (alexithymia). Among the strongest links of emotion to health involve the protective effects of social support, possibly mediated by stress-buffering. Another important but often overlooked process linking emotion to health involves interoceptive classical conditioning. The role of classical conditioning in mediating conditioned emotional responses (CERs) to exteroceptive stimuli (e.g., fear of high places) is well known. But, such conditioning can involve interoceptive stimuli as well, including immune responses. Interoceptive stimuli are unconscious: if you swallow a balloon with shock electrodes to shock your stomach interior, nothing is felt until the shocks are quite strong. Interoceptive stimuli easily serve as CSs to conditioned responses, generalize widely, and such responses are difficult to extinguish. As a result, an “inferable unconscious” must be built up within everyone, with important health implications.


Ursula Hess, Agneta Fischer:

Yes, they always do. The elicitation of negative emotions leads to negative feelings and stress, and may ultimately lead to depression or physical health problems. In addition, studies have shown that the ways in which we cope with negative emotions also affects our health. For example, too much rumination contributes to depression, and suppression of emotion also leads to health problems. On the other hand, reappraisal, i.e. putting things into perspective, and the replacement of positive for negative emotions lead to fewer health problems. Various factors have shown to affect coping styles and regulation strategies, such as a person’s self-efficacy and external resources (e.g., one’s social network). However, negative emotions can also have positive effects. For example, angry people are more optimistic and goal focussed. Hence at times it may also be a good idea to up-regulate negative emotions and down-regulate positive ones.


Martijn Van Zomeren:

We know that, across the board, inclusion in social relationships is beneficial to one’s health, while exclusion from social relationships impairs both mental and physical health. If emotions exist most of the time between people who are trying to regulate their relationships, then emotions should affect those relationships, and by implication, health. Nevertheless, direct empirical relationships are likely to be complex as different emotions also serve to communicate about relationships, with different emotions sending different messages. So, the relationship between social relationships and health is more straightforward than the relationship between health and emotions.
Next week, the experts will weigh in on how our emotional expressions affect others.



About The Authors

Ross Buck

Ross Buck is Professor of Communication Sciences and Psychology at the University of Connecticut....

View profile >

Ursula Hess

Ursula Hess is Professor of Psychology at the Humboldt University, Berlin. She received her PhD in psychology from Dartmouth College and is a Fellow at the Association for Psycholo...

View profile >

Rolf Reber

Rolf Reber is Professor of Cognitive Psychology at the University of Oslo and Adjunct Professor in the Department of Education at the University of Bergen, Norway. With his colleag...

View profile >

Martijn van Zomeren

Martijn van Zomeren is Associate Professor in the Department of Social Psychology at the University of Groningen, the Netherlands. In 2009 he was awarded a prestigious VENI grant f...

View profile >

Latest Comments

Have your say!