From WorldNet’s Sweet Land of Liberty

Nat Hentoff

Posted: January 14, 2009
1:00 am Eastern

I am still skeptical that our new president will – or can – fulfill all his sweeping promises, but he has made an essential start by bringing the CIA back into our rule of law by appointing Leon Panetta as director of the agency. It is significant that next to the New York Times Jan. 5 front-page story on his appointment was an account of a six-year imprisonment, with torture, of a Pakistani first “rendered” (kidnapped) by the CIA and now released without ever having been charged with any crime.

Critics of President-elect Barack Obama’s choice charge that Panetta has had no direct experience with the CIA or other intelligence work. Actually, as Fred Kaplan reveals in Slate (Jan. 6), while Panetta was Bill Clinton’s director of the Office of Management and Budget, “he was one of a very few people who knew about all of the covert and special-access programs” – and he knows where to find the buried line-item budget items concerning the CIA.

As for Panetta’s patriotic and moral qualifications for his new office, he wrote last year in Washington Monthly: “Those who support torture (the CIA’s involvement in torture has been extensively documented) may believe that we can abuse captives in certain select circumstances and still be true to our values. We either believe in … the rule of law … or we don’t. There is no middle ground.”

Panetta added: “The Constitution was drafted by those who looked around the world of the 18th century and saw persecution, torture, and other crimes against humanity and believed that America could be better than that.”

Bush and Cheney have deeply shaken the world’s – including our allies’ – belief that we are, indeed, different.

The president-elect made another equally vital appointment that introduces the CIA to our Constitution. Beginning in 2002, it was at the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel – which advises the president, the attorney general and others in the executive branch on constitutional matters – that torture became U.S. policy, and other violations of international treaties and our own laws against cruel and inhumane punishments were also legitimized.

In the Obama administration, the head of the Office of Legal Counsel will be Dawn Johnsen, University of Indiana constitutional law professor, who previously served there under Clinton. She is convinced, like Panetta, that we can and will overcome terrorists by refusing to resemble them in any way.

Before I continue in the next column to indicate the possible impact of these two appointments in markedly improving our intelligence services, here is a partial list of the specific war crimes in international law and our own statues that have been committed during the past eight years, and before, by highly EXPERIENCED CIA officials and their agents in the field.

Neither Panetta nor Johnsen has committed any war crimes.

In Article 3 of the four Geneva Conventions of 1949, which the United States signed and has made part of our law, any person detained by our forces is guaranteed the right to freedom from “cruel treatment and torture; outrages on personal dignity (and) humiliating and degrading treatment.”

These rights must be in effect whether the detainee is a prisoner of war, unprivileged belligerent or noncombatant and – as I often tried to remind Dick Cheney in my columns – the guarantees apply “in all circumstances” and “at any time and in any place whatsoever.”

Moreover, the U.S. War Crimes Act of 1996 makes it a criminal offense for military personnel to commit the war crimes I have cited from the Geneva Conventions. That law was passed by a Republican-controlled Congress.

Also, and this should interest the new secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton, the indispensable 1,249-page thoroughly documented “The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib” (Cambridge University Press) adds that our State Department Country Reports on Human Rights Practices “have expressly characterized as ‘torture’ or ‘other abuse’ tying detainees in painful positions; incommunicado detention; depriving detainees of sleep … long periods of imprisonment in darkened rooms … and instilling detainees with the false belief that they are about to be killed.”

That’s waterboarding, Mr. Departing Attorney General Michael Mukasey.

These are also precisely the common practices of torture and other abuses that occurred during the Bush-Cheney administration in our own detention centers. We do not yet know the interrogation techniques that have been used in the CIA’s secret prisons. In view of Panetta’s and Johnsen’s statements about the fundamental need to re-establish our rule of law for the CIA, I expect that they will insist on finding out – and telling us – what has been taking place in those “black sites.”

Instead of aiding the enemy by disclosing these methods of interrogation specially authorized by George W. Bush, this sunlight will make Americans and the world believe we are indeed a government of laws, not of amoral apparatchiks.

As Panetta said last year in the Monterey County Herald, President Bush “is using fear to trump the law.” Doing this is just plain unAmerican, and history will not absolve that administration.

]]> http://www.cambridgeblog.org/2009/01/americanizing-the-cia/feed/ 0 http://www.cambridgeblog.org/2008/07/it-was-only-a-matter-of-time/ http://www.cambridgeblog.org/2008/07/it-was-only-a-matter-of-time/#comments Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:13:52 +0000 CambridgeBlog http://cupblog.wordpress.com/?p=338 The folks at Slate have been so kind as to put together a Venn Diagram of The crimes committed by the Bush Administration. Oh, where to start?

Though you can follow the chart well enough from here, I’d suggest you click on it for the interactive version. It fills one with a strange kind of righteous irritation.

Well, the good kind.

All those memos on torture were documented by someone, you know. Karen Greenberg and her colleagues did a lot of research legwork documenting torture in the administration.

Meanwhile, Laura Donohue has assembled a great resource detailing loss of civil liberties in the administration’s war on terrorism.

In his June 24 column, he picks up a couple Cambridge law titles that hammer home Bush’s legal sidestepping.

In a June 6 letter to Attorney General Michael Mukasey—largely ignored by a press immersed in the future of Hillary Clinton—56 Democrats in the House of Representatives asked for “an immediate investigation with the appointment of a special counsel to determine whether actions taken by the President, his Cabinet, and other Administration officials are in violation of the War Crimes Act (18 U.S.C. 2441) . . . and other U.S. and international laws.”

This isn’t front-page news?

Read the article >>